BR Group
Article wallpaper
Home / Blog / DeFi Market Making: how liquidity providers earn with active ranges, hooks, and on-chain order books

DeFi Market Making: how liquidity providers earn with active ranges, hooks, and on-chain order books

INTRODUCTION

Decentralised finance once promised “an exchange without middlemen”, yet the first automated market makers (AMMs) turned out too simple. A pool followed the x·y = k formula, an investor poured in tokens and waited for fees—then wondered why the final balance lagged a basic “buy and hold”. A new generation of market makers has arrived: they shift price ranges, write algorithmic hooks, trade in on-chain order books and watch risk dashboards to fend off front-running. This article explains in plain language how it all works and what to do so your capital earns instead of subsidising others.

WHY DEFI NEEDS MARKET MAKERS

  • Without a counterparty every swap slips the price.
  • The deeper the pool, the smaller the price jump; trust in the protocol rises.
  • A market maker is a user willing to park capital for a fee, but only under a clear risk model.

FACT BOX

At the peak of the DeFi boom total value locked topped 150 billion dollars, yet up to 60 percent of that money kept hopping between protocols just for short-term incentives. Stable, “sticky” liquidity is rarer than it looks.

FROM SIMPLE AMM TO ACTIVE LIQUIDITY

Concentrated ranges replace the “fill-the-whole-curve” approach. Uniswap V3 lets a liquidity provider (LP) allocate capital to a chosen price band, like placing bid-ask walls. Narrow bands earn more fees per dollar, but when the market leaves the band the position stops working and bleeds into a single token.

Predictable loss explains why passive LPs fall behind. The pool continually trades against better-informed takers. Two classic shields: rebalance the range more often or raise the fee when volatility rises.

HOOKS IN UNISWAP V4 AND PROGRAMMABLE POOLS

Uniswap V4 turns a pool into a plug-and-play chassis. Developers can upload a hook—mini-code that triggers on each swap. Popular ideas:

  • Auto-shifting the range as the spot price moves.
  • A dynamic fee: cheap in quiet hours, expensive in panics.
  • Built-in limit orders so an LP effectively owns a “micro-exchange”.

The bar is higher now: to earn, a liquidity provider needs engineering talent as much as spare capital.

FULLY ON-CHAIN ORDER BOOKS

Automated pools are easy but inflexible. Projects like Hyperliquid publish the entire order book on-chain, promising CEX speed without custody risk. Advantages are clear—iceberg orders, real-time spreads—but so are the downsides:

  • Each action sits in the public mempool, inviting front-runners.
  • Small-cap tokens are easy to whip-saw with a few spoofed orders.
  • Block finality may lag when markets explode, trapping orders.

TOKEN INCENTIVES: DOES BUYING DEPTH WORK?

Protocols often “buy” liquidity by airdropping their token to LPs. On paper it shines: every dollar in incentives once attracted up to six dollars of TVL. Reality is mixed: one pool’s depth ballooned one hundred forty times, another barely covered the budget. The lesson: target incentives to real volume and keep them temporary, or they burn cash without loyalty.

KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR MARKET MAKERS

  1. Passive liquidity is dying. If you never move the range or tweak the fee, the market slowly taxes your position.
  2. Code is new alpha. Custom hooks mean the best developers capture the fee stream.
  3. Incentives work selectively. Token giveaways are fireworks—flashy, short-lived and costly if unfocused.
  4. Old risks return. Where an order book appears, so do pump-and-dump, front-run and flash-crash patterns. Makers need the same surveillance tools they built for centralised exchanges.

OPEN QUESTIONS

  • Will custom-hook strategies pay back development costs over a year or two? No public track records yet.
  • How sticky is “bought” liquidity once incentives end? Data are thin.
  • Can fully on-chain books resist MEV without centralising validators? Still unproven.
  • How will growing SEC and CFTC pressure reshape DeFi market making? Private sidechains? KYC-gated pools? Unknown territory.

CONCLUSION

A decentralised market maker no longer “drops tokens and forgets”. They write code, slide liquidity, count gas and hedge on the fly. In a world where every pool can host custom logic and every order is visible before settlement, success goes to the most adaptable player, not the fastest. Are you ready to rewrite your scripts for the next wave of DeFi?

CALL TO ACTION

  • Deploy a bot that tracks price and nudges your liquidity band automatically.
  • Switch on a dynamic fee schedule: higher volatility, higher fee.
  • Join pilot incentive programmes, but measure how much TVL stays a month after rewards stop.
  • Test an on-chain order book with small tokens first; feel the gas and front-run impact before scaling up.

Like this post? Share it:

Read More